In this case, the automated algorithm will reduce the width as much as you asked for, but it will distort some areas of the image. Unfortunately, your image falls into this category. On the other hand, if the image is dense with detail, there may not be any paths through the image suitable for such pruning, whether automated by an algorithm such as this, or done manually. In cases like this, this algorithm can be a god-send. Said differently, it changes the aspect ratio in some areas of the image, but not in others. For example, if you have a bride and groom standing a bit too far apart on a more or less featureless beach, the algorithm will selectively remove parts of the beach in between the two subjects but not change the subjects in any way. This works great in certain cases, not so well in others. Basically, if you need to reduce the width of an image, it finds a bunch of thin, more-or-less vertical wiggly paths through the image that have the least amount of detail along each path, and then the algorithm starts removing those paths from the image and smoothly joining up the pieces on either side of each path. This approach gives you the option of introducing no aspect ratio distortion whatsoever.ī) In one of the recent releases of PS, Adobe introduced a technique called content-aware scaling. Make it look like an intentional part of the design of the card. Obviously, the border will have a different thickness in the two directions. ![]() It doesn't have to be plain black or white - it could be made from nested rectangular or other geometric key lines, ornate or whatever you want. ![]() There are only two suggestions I can offer that you haven't really considered:Ī) Introduce a border that goes all the way around the image. Crop it to the desired aspect ratio and you either have to throw away something, or have to introduce extra blank edge(s). Don't constrain the proportions and the entire image becomes squished horizontally.Ģa and b. Something has to give if you need to morph something with one aspect ratio (11 by 14 = 1.27 ) into a different aspect ratio (4 by 6 = 1.5).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |